| Lost password
430 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?
 1 2
 1 2
03/25/2008 19:29
guest

not registered

03/25/2008 19:29
guest

not registered

Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

Is there anyone with information and personal experience who has used the doctor at UCLA in California for their NA? If so, would you recommend him? I finally need it and would like to save time and money and not have to go to Paris or San Francisco to get this done. I work and can't take much time.

Thanks for the help..

05/01/2008 13:16
cjines 
05/01/2008 13:16
cjines 
Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

I had a great experience with Dr. Benhaim and great results from the NA procedure. I can't recommend him highly enough,

05/09/2008 10:20
Linda B

not registered

05/09/2008 10:20
Linda B

not registered

Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

i was wondering the same thing as I am close....Thanks for the info..I had gone to Dr. Eaton and have the highest regards for him but need to find someone closer...I was considering Kline in Idaho..but L.A. is closer.. No web site for ucla doc though..

05/09/2008 11:31
Linda B U.S.A

not registered

05/09/2008 11:31
Linda B U.S.A

not registered

Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

Quest..Did doctor Benheim in L.A. fit you with a night brace..

05/09/2008 21:23
Randy_H 
05/09/2008 21:23
Randy_H 

Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

While I have no personal experience with Dr. Benhaim I've read numerous posts about him on the old BioS Forum.

First, he is not Paris trained but has received instruction from Denkler. Last I heard he was actually putting some of his patients to sleep rather than using a local, which in my mind is not really NA. NA relies on the patient feedback to tell the doc if a nerve is in danger. He may have evolved since then, as that was a few years ago. Check with him. My impression is that Dr. Benhaim is *very* conservative and cautious. At UCLA he is somewhat under the watchful eye of a former NA detractor and past head of the ASSH who once referred to NA as "snake oil".

Denkler on the other hand is under no such constraints and is quite aggressive with NA. He helped Benhaim with NA for the PIP.

Bottom line, If you need MCP correction Benhaim would probably be as good as anyone. However, for a PIP I doubt he's in Denkler's league. Few are. That does not mean you would not get the *exact* same results, but for a PIP I'd fly up to S. F. for the superior expertise

I'm very happy that someone at UCLA is doing NA. I'd just be curious as to whether Dr. Benhaim has moved away from his locally influenced conservatism into doing NA in the traditional fashion with just a local like everyone else. Having him a strong NA advocate may help turn the tide in LA. Like at most teaching hospitals, the higher-ups at UCLA still don't "get it" regarding NA. Benhaim could be of great help if he has moved in Denkler's direction.

Edited at 05/10/08 00:27

05/09/2008 22:16
Luba

not registered

05/09/2008 22:16
Luba

not registered

Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

Linda,
here is the website for Dr. Benhaim:

http://www.uclaplasticsurgery.com/our_do...er_benhaim.html

I personally don't have any experience with him. I have not met him, however, I made a consultation appointment with him for the end of August. He has a waiting list for new patients.

I agree with Randy, and believe that Dr. Denkler is more experienced with PIP. I met Dr. Denkler in July of 2006 when he corrected my small finger, PIP joint and have nothing but positive things to say about him and the procedure. Unfortunately, the correction didn't hold and a year after the NA, the contracture went back to the original 45%. Its been holding at 45% for two years.

I will have a second NA and thought I would consult with Dr. Benhaim because I live near UCLA, but the more I read on this forum, I conclude that I probably should go back to Dr. Denkler who is more experienced and has a more aggressive approach.

05/15/2008 04:48
ademas 
05/15/2008 04:48
ademas 
Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

I had my NA performed by Dr. Benhaim in March '07. I was very impressed, and the results are holding up very well.

I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to anyone.

05/16/2008 23:47
Spike!

not registered

05/16/2008 23:47
Spike!

not registered

Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

I'm unsure about Dr. Benheim.

I too live in L.A. and I had NA with Dr. Denkler in July 06 and just today 5-16-08 about 3 hours ago. I talked to Dr. Benheim each time before choosing Dr Denkler. I just felt much more secure with him. I couldn't get into Dr Benheim until August and then after sending a picture to him he was unsure. Keith Denkler on the other hand (no pun intended!) looked at the picture and said no problem. I attribute that to Keith having done about 1500 NAs so far while Benheim has only done a few hundred. I'm a guitar player so I'm very cautious about who I want messing with my hand! I was also able to get an appointment in just a few weeks.

As for the procedure today it went quickly and smoothly, though the initial numbing injections are not might favorite part
it's a small price to pay for the great result. BTW Keith feels that in a couple of years the enzyme injection will
be the way to go.

One other thing, I have no contratures but my hand cupped inward and it impacts my playing as well as some yoga poses.
Anyone who has tried "down dog" will know what I mean.

And did I mention Keith is a great guy!

Hope this helps some folks.

05/17/2008 00:00
artmuns 
05/17/2008 00:00
artmuns 
Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?

I'm unsure about Dr. Benheim.

I too live in L.A. and I had NA with Dr. Denkler in July 06 and just today 5-16-08 about 3 hours ago. I talked to Dr. Benheim each time before choosing Dr Denkler. I just felt much more secure with him. I couldn't get into Dr Benheim until August and then after sending a picture to him he was unsure. Keith Denkler on the other hand (no pun intended!) looked at the picture and said no problem. I attribute that to Keith having done about 1500 NAs so far while Benheim has only done a few hundred. I'm a guitar player so I'm very cautious about who I want messing with my hand! I was also able to get an appointment in just a few weeks.

As for the procedure today it went quickly and smoothly, though the initial numbing injections are not might favorite part it's a small price to pay for the great result. BTW Keith feels that in a couple of years the enzyme injection will be the way to go.

One other thing, I have no contratures but my hand cupped inward and it impacts my playing as well as some yoga poses. Anyone who has tried "down dog" will know what I mean.

And did I mention Keith is a great guy!

Hope this helps some folks.



08/31/2008 11:11
LindaB 
08/31/2008 11:11
LindaB 
Re: Is the doctor at UCLA good to go to for NA? Was he trained in Paris?


Linda in California, U.S.A

OK.. I am leaning towards Dinkler even though he is further away.. Can anyone recommend a place tha tis not too expensive in that area of Larkspur or close by to spend a week or so..
I am a little concened about Benhaim puttingyou tosleep.. Why is this... EATON WANTED YOU AWAKE BECAUSE HE ASKED YOU IF HE WAS NEAR A NERVE OR IF IT HURT??

 1 2
 1 2
California   Denkler   recommend   experienced   procedure   Unfortunately   instructions   experience   conservatism   conservative   contratures   results   correction   uclaplasticsurgery   Benhaim   information   consultation   trained   appointment   Benheim