| Lost password
113 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
Protocol for radiation on DD
 1 2
 1 2
08/30/2013 03:23
stephenp 
08/30/2013 03:23
stephenp 
Re: Protocol for radiation on DD

I had a gap of about 8 weeks. The radiologist said that he cannot see a theoretical reason for the gap.

In the major publication on RT, there was no significant difference between groups receiving 30Gys (2 sets of 3Gy/day for 5 days separated by 10-12 weeks and 21Gy delivered in 7 treatments over a 2 week period.

    10/03/2013 17:33
    nanshands 
    10/03/2013 17:33
    nanshands 
    Re: Protocol for radiation on DD

    stephenp:
    I had a gap of about 8 weeks. The radiologist said that he cannot see a theoretical reason for the gap.

    In the major publication on RT, there was no significant difference between groups receiving 30Gys (2 sets of 3Gy/day for 5 days separated by 10-12 weeks and 21Gy delivered in 7 treatments over a 2 week period.


    Hello Stephen,

    Can you reference the "major publication on RT" that you are referring to? This protocol aspect is becoming very frustrating to me as I try and decide where to go for RT. Getting all kinds of varying responses from oncologists as to what they do and what they feel is best.

    Thanks,

    Nan

       1 2
       1 2
      appears--having   Seegenschiedt   treatments   Seegenschmiedt   experience   significant   radiation   proliferation   prescription   Kirkpatrick   because   dupuytren   treatment   involvement----he   Protocol   publication   ultrasound--and   theoretical   oncologist   radiologist