| Lost password
403 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
questions about radiation
 1
 1
11/12/2009 08:20
guest

not registered

11/12/2009 08:20
guest

not registered

questions about radiation

1. I read that Essen tells patients less than one percent risk of cancer and less than one percent risk of leukemia following radiation therapy for DD. If one is having radiation to the finger, is there more of a chance of the bone being radiated and therefore more of a risk for leukemia or other systemic problems?

Has anyone had radiation to a finger nodule/cord and therefore was told anything about this by their doctor?
I think both "Newman" and "Wach" reported radiation to fingers.

2. What margin around the nodule was there? I'm guessing about 1/2-1 inch (1-2cm) on either side, is this correct?

3. If a linear accelerator is used instead of the orthovoltage like Essen, is there more of a chance of having the bone exposed to radiation?

4. Would there be any advantage to spreading out the treatment to more days in order to reduce side effects of dryness, etc. For example, if one is getting 15Gy--instead of 3Gyx5days, what about a day off between treatments or even two days off?

What about making it 1.5Gyx10 days? Would that be of any help?

Thanks for help in answering any or all of these questions

11/12/2009 10:29
wach 

Administrator

11/12/2009 10:29
wach 

Administrator

Re: questions about radiation

Mny good questions but difficult to answer. I can only give my honest opinion but I am not a MD. Answers see below "A:"

Wolfgang

Quote:



1. I read that Essen tells patients less than one percent risk of cancer and less than one percent risk of leukemia following radiation therapy for DD. If one is having radiation to the finger, is there more of a chance of the bone being radiated and therefore more of a risk for leukemia or other systemic problems?
A: you might want to read the Dupuytren article of the boook edited by Seegenschmiedt et al, link ist on http://www.dupuytren-online.info/radioth...literature.html . I don't think it would make much of a difference but I also wouldn't think that the modelling is that detailed. Any estimate is necessarily based on a model, there are no hard data because cancer hasn't ever been observed after Dupuytren treatment and you would need many such cases to make a reliable statistics. Fortunately we don't have them.

Has anyone had radiation to a finger nodule/cord and therefore was told anything about this by their doctor?
I think both "Newman" and "Wach" reported radiation to fingers.
A: I had finger exposed but no one ever mentioned a difference.

2. What margin around the nodule was there? I'm guessing about 1/2-1 inch (1-2cm) on either side, is this correct?
A: yes

3. If a linear accelerator is used instead of the orthovoltage like Essen, is there more of a chance of having the bone exposed to radiation?
A: ?

4. Would there be any advantage to spreading out the treatment to more days in order to reduce side effects of dryness, etc. For example, if one is getting 15Gy--instead of 3Gyx5days, what about a day off between treatments or even two days off?

What about making it 1.5Gyx10 days? Would that be of any help?
A: maybe. Some clinics are using treatment on 2 consecutive days (4 Gy each) and then 6 weeks break, another 2 days etc. here are no published data how much difference that makes in terms of reducing side effects and of reducing efficiency of the treatment. Reseacrh is still on-going and there is still some heuristics involved.

Thanks for help in answering any or all of these questions


11/12/2009 14:46
flojo 
11/12/2009 14:46
flojo 
Re: questions about radiation

I was told at Scripps that the purpose of the Ct scan was to determine how deep to send the radiation. The tech showed me the images on the computer screen where the nodules were in relationship to my bone. They only wanted to go deep enough to get the nodules but not to the bone. As I understand it, the electron radiation used at Scripps can be quite precise in the depth the e-beams are sent. It just made sense to me to direct it to the tissue and not into the bone.

11/13/2009 00:12
newman 
11/13/2009 00:12
newman 

Re: questions about radiation

Hi Guest-Australia Calling. It is good that you are making these enquiries as it is important to feel comfortable in yourself before having any Radiotherapy.I would recommend Clicking Radiation Therapy on left margin -open 'Side effects ' then 'Literature'. Professor Seegenschmiedt has given permission to publish extracts from Radiotherpy for Non-Malignant Disorders. Click on the link- Page 176 will address your question on the application of RT.You will see that when using linear accelerators a bolus (filter) is used , which controls the depth to be treated- eg 0 to 10 mm. Page 179 looks at Risks. You do not mention your age, which is a factor. In my case I had Radiotherapy to selected areas and not whole of hand.Hope this helps .

11/13/2009 00:56
newman 
11/13/2009 00:56
newman 

Re: questions about radiation Time span between treatment.

Australia Calling.Hi Guest. The time span between treatment is not as important, as the total dose of radiation. In my case some areas received 15 Gy. Some areas received 15 Gy and six months later received another 15 Gy. In Germany some practitioners give 2 daily treatments of 4 Gy and then repeat the treatment at 2 month intervals up to a total of 32 Gy. ie time span of 8 months.Regards

 1
 1
treatments   questions   Non-Malignant   radiation   practitioners   dupuytren-online   Radiotherpy   relationship   orthovoltage   therefore   accelerators   Seegenschmiedt   Radiotherapy   comfortable   accelerator   difference   application   Guest-Australia   treatment   15Gy--instead