ME,

"Makes it look like many people are sharing the same experience" .....when they actually are not???

Are you saying that over 1,300 individuals haven't really had successful NA performed in America over the last two years? It sounds like that's exactly what you are implying. That's the real bottom line of this thread you've started, isn't it?

That false asserting can be disproved immediately by anyone who cares to do so.

1) Check Dr. Eaton's web site at http://www.handcenter.org/newfile16.htmhttp://www.handcenter.org/newfile16.htm

2) Call his office and ask how may successful NA's he has performed with Zero nerve damage. (561) 746-7686

3) Now, with over 1,300 people having been treated with NA by this one doctor alone, ask yourself if it is reasonable that we be seeing as many positive posts about NA as we see here? Personally I'd expect more.

Again, your assertions are supported by nothing and in fact seem a tad paranoid in light of verifiable facts. I suggest you do you homework before bringing this kind of weak reactionary BS into this Forum.

Tom,

The messages ARE POSTED within this website where the authors claim and encourage others to use multiple logins. Read through the messages. I found them and as would any one. Some attributed to the most frequent posters. But these could be highjacked names. Who knows?

The proof is there and it is hard to understand why recent message jump to the protection of NA when the problem is not which method of treatment anyone selects, but reading message afer message that may not be genuinue.

So, to the fake posters. Stop it. Its beyond silly.

ME:

Why should anyone list to your totally unsubstantiated assertion when you haven't even attempted to answer my very basic question? So, here we go again:

With over 1,300 successful NA procedures done by Dr. Eaton (who is just one of the 8 surgeons currently doing NA in the US) isn't the large number of glowing reports of NA found here completely in line with the large number of NAs being done on a daily basis?

If you can't answer that question, why are you wasting our time?

Let's just be honest here, "ME". Let's cut to the chase. Let's DO talk about the Truth and the "Facts".

1) This sight has been used successfully by various posters over a five year period to bringing a 35 year old French procedure called "NA" to the United States.

2) Without such use of this site, no US surgeons would be offering NA. The sole option of patients would continue to be Open Surgery. As it is, treatment of our common disease is changing, with 8 surgeons (so far) who have seen the wisdom in learning NA and offering it.

3) NA is still "controversial" in that most American surgeons are still unaware of it's effectiveness and safety record. However, considering that no US surgeon offered the procedure just 2 1/2 years ago, the trend is obvious.

4) This trend would only be possible if the procedure was, in fact, both safe and effective.

"ME", it's obvious that you doubt that NA is both Safe and Effective. Why else would you attack postings of the site most effectively used to change the way our disease is treated?

That's fine. What's not so fine is that you refuse to engage in legitimate debate regarding NA's legitimacy. Instead you resort to attacking the legitimacy of posters who are informing both patients and surgeons. Your reactionary cowardice will be evident to all who study the records of this site, especially the thread: "Treatment by Dr. Eaton"

If you actually have DC, I strongly suggest you call one of the 8 surgeons listed here. Send pictures of your hand. Chances are good that you will benefit from this significant breakthrough in noninvasive treatment. Hopefully then you'll snap out of this counter productive little fit you're having.

Sherry,

Because of the activities of a "Troll" who was hijacking peoples names and putting words in their mouth, many of us needed to assume different posting names as a back up. I still use my second name from time to time.

"ME" seems to find the very positive posts about NA so hard to fathom that he/she can only assume that they are being faked. Occasionally people show up here who assume that because *their* doctors are not NA fans, NA could not possibly generate the kind of results being reported here, over and over and over again. I think "ME" fits in that rather rare camp.

This too shall pass.