I last posted a few years ago on the old forum. I'm a 61 year old male. In 2005 I flew from L.A. to Florida to have Dr. Eaton perform NA. In 20 minutes my ring and pinky went from 30 degrees to flat. I played golf 3 days later. A few years later it came back in the same area. As many of you know, it no longer requires a cross country trip. I enlisted the services of Dr. Benhaim at UCLA. In the consultation, he mentioned that he does a more aggressive procedure than Dr. Eaton. He said the reason was to prevent, or at least slow down reoccurance. I had Dr. Benhaim's larger gauge needle almost 5 years to the day after Dr. Eaton's. This time the hand was bandaged for about 3 weeks. The dressing had to be changed every day. Not fun. I also had to go the hand therapy twice a week for about a month. My other hand is showing DD symptoms. When it's time, I'll opt for the Dr. Eaton style minimal invasive approach even at the risk of a quicker reoccurance.

tsperry:

---

I last posted a few years ago on the old forum. I'm a 61 year old male. In 2005 I flew from L.A. to Florida to have Dr. Eaton perform NA. In 20 minutes my ring and pinky went from 30 degrees to flat. I played golf 3 days later. A few years later it came back in the same area. As many of you know, it no longer requires a cross country trip. I enlisted the services of Dr. Benhaim at UCLA. In the consultation, he mentioned that he does a more aggressive procedure than Dr. Eaton. He said the reason was to prevent, or at least slow down reoccurance. I had Dr. Benhaim's larger gauge needle almost 5 years to the day after Dr. Eaton's. This time the hand was bandaged for about 3 weeks. The dressing had to be changed every day. Not fun. I also had to go the hand therapy twice a week for about a month. My other hand is showing DD symptoms. When it's time, I'll opt for the Dr. Eaton style minimal invasive approach even at the risk of a quicker reoccurance.