| Lost password
140 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
Forum for Dupuytren's and Ledderhose 
  • Forum
    • › 
  • Dupuytren Disease
    • › 
  • Protocol for radiation on DD
    • Protocol for radiation on DD
    		 1 2
     1 2
    08/30/2013 03:23
    stephenp 
    08/30/2013 03:23
    stephenp      		Re: Protocol for radiation on DD

    I had a gap of about 8 weeks. The radiologist said that he cannot see a theoretical reason for the gap.

    In the major publication on RT, there was no significant difference between groups receiving 30Gys (2 sets of 3Gy/day for 5 days separated by 10-12 weeks and 21Gy delivered in 7 treatments over a 2 week period.
    10/03/2013 17:33
    nanshands 
    10/03/2013 17:33
    nanshands      		Re: Protocol for radiation on DD

    stephenp:
    I had a gap of about 8 weeks. The radiologist said that he cannot see a theoretical reason for the gap.

    In the major publication on RT, there was no significant difference between groups receiving 30Gys (2 sets of 3Gy/day for 5 days separated by 10-12 weeks and 21Gy delivered in 7 treatments over a 2 week period.


    Hello Stephen,

    Can you reference the "major publication on RT" that you are referring to? This protocol aspect is becoming very frustrating to me as I try and decide where to go for RT. Getting all kinds of varying responses from oncologists as to what they do and what they feel is best.

    Thanks,

    Nan
    		 1 2
     1 2
    significant   proliferation   radiologists   Seegenschiedt   radiologist   radiation   Kirkpatrick   Protocol   experience   involvement----he   prescription   theoretical   ultrasound--and   Seegenschmiedt   treatment   publication   because   oncologist   appears--having   apparently