| Lost password
342 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
Xiaflex approved by FDA today
 1 2 3 4 5
 1 2 3 4 5
02/03/2010 00:16
peterm 
02/03/2010 00:16
peterm 
Xiaflex approved by FDA today

Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUXL), a specialty biopharmaceutical company, today announced that it has received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for XIAFLEX™ (collagenase clostridium histolyticum), a novel, first-in-class, orphan-designated, biologic, for the treatment of adult Dupuytren's contracture patients with a palpable cord. The Company expects to begin shipping XIAFLEX to its distribution partners in early March in advance of a launch planned for late March.

Hope this helps.

God bless us all.

02/03/2010 02:10
flojo 
02/03/2010 02:10
flojo 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

I'm glad. It will be an alternative to surgery that will be more widely accessible and much publicity/advertisement by the drug company. It's an option for some who'd prefer Ziaflex to NA. The publicity will bring more attention to Dupuytren's Disease that affects a lot of people.

Even with Ziaflex, this stupid disease will still progress. RT will still be the only thing out right now that stops it from progressing. I like the protocols I used, NA then RT. For many people however, NA is just not available at a reasonable distance for them to access it easily. That would help a whole lot of people.

02/03/2010 19:56
Mike

not registered

02/03/2010 19:56
Mike

not registered

Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

"The FDA has approved the first drug for the progressive hand disease known as Dupuytren's contracture -- the injectable collagenase clostridium histolyticum (Xiaflex).

The biologic drug, manufactured by Auxilium Pharmaceuticals of Malvern, Pa., breaks down excess collagen that builds up in the hand, preventing preventing the fingers from relaxing and straightening normally.

In announcing the approval, the FDA noted that until now the only effective treatment for the condition was surgery, which often entails a long recovery with physical therapy.

Drug approval was based on data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials of 374 adult patients who had not received surgical treatment on a selected primary joint within 90 days of the first injection, and who did not use anticoagulation medicine within seven days of the study.

The primary endpoint in both studies was a reduction of joint contracture by five degrees after up to three injections. Patients in the collagenase group outperformed placebo, with 64% meeting endpoint in all joints versus 7% in placebo group in Study 1, and 44% versus 5% in Study 2.

Serious side effects of the collagenase drug include tendon rupture and ligament damage that can prevent a finger from fully bending and may require surgery to correct.

Other side effects include swelling, bruising, bleeding, and injection site pain.

Patients using anticoagulants other than low-dose aspirin should avoid using collagenase clostridium histolyticum, according to the prescribing information".


5 DEGREES?

02/04/2010 03:48
flojo 
02/04/2010 03:48
flojo 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

I didn't know there were so many side effects with Xiaflex. That paints a different picture. Hopefully, the discussion about it will lead people to research for other treatment options, like NA and RT. They won't get the information from their GP, surgeon or other doctors. My experience is that most practitioners just don't know about anything but surgery. My own do now, because I've made sure they know. How did I find out? This website!

02/04/2010 15:11
jimh 
02/04/2010 15:11
jimh 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

The goal of the trials was a 5 degree improvement - absolutely insignificant in practical terms. And Auxilium is still talking thousands of dollars for treatment. Will insurers pay for this? If I were at an insurance company making this decision I'd be saying "wait a minute..."



02/04/2010 17:17
LubaM. 
02/04/2010 17:17
LubaM. 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

Very dissapointing....After my first NA (done in 2006) reocurred after six months, I anxiously awaited approval by FDA of Xiaflex. Now its finally approved but there are so many negatives....high cost, side effects and the most important no studies to indicate long term results.

When my second hand developed nodules I opted for RT to hopefully stop the progression and possible contractures. At least with RT there are many research papers and long term studies from German doctors that have been published.

I would rather have repeated NA's until we know more about Xiaflex.

02/04/2010 20:51
jimh 
02/04/2010 20:51
jimh 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

Compared to surgery, the side effects of Xiaflex are minor. I had some pain and bruising after NA, too.

Auxilium may or may not be able to get the high price they're talking about. Their attitude seems to be that as long as it costs less than surgery, insurers will pay (and as usual there's no thought of people without insurance). But I think that if they're going collect as much money as for a surgery, they'll need to deliver roughly equivalent results.

02/05/2010 01:08
flojo 
02/05/2010 01:08
flojo 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

Xiaflex doesn't stop the progression. Surgery seems to trigger faster developing Dupuytren's for some people. I wonder if Xiaflex will cause it to progress faster. We know that RT is the only thing out there right now that stops the progression.

02/10/2010 19:53
SusanInVA 
02/10/2010 19:53
SusanInVA 
Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

I am scheduled for surgery 24 Feb for Dupuytren's on my left hand. Does anyone know how long it will be before Xiaflex injections are available to doctors? My doctor indicated it might be a while. Insurance companies probably take their time deciding if they want to cover a procedure. Does anyone have knowledge of this?
Having 2nd thoughts about surgery.
Thanks

02/10/2010 20:01
Randy_H 
02/10/2010 20:01
Randy_H 

Re: Xiaflex approved by FDA today

SusanInVA:

Please, please consider NA before you let anyone cut open your hand. Xiaflex and NA do almost exactly the same thing. Xiaflex does it with enzymes while NA uses the end of a syringe. Same non-invasive result. I've had both NA and Open surgery. No compassion. Do yourself a favor and study NA. Don't listen to what *any* hand surgeon says about NA unless they themselves had done it. Otherwise they generally don't have a clue.

 1 2 3 4 5
 1 2 3 4 5
nodules   practitioners   procedure   Auxilium   electro-mechanic   information   placebo-controlled   Xiaflex   approved   surgery   patients   Pharmaceuticals   Dupuytren   orphan-designated   insurance   contracture   treatment   progression   surgeon   biopharmaceutical