Collagenase sounds great, let~sq~s do it. |
|
1 2 3
|
1 2 3
|
08/31/2005 23:28
Steve Coluccinot registered
|
08/31/2005 23:28
Steve Coluccinot registered
|
Collagenase sounds great, let~sq~s do it.
My wife has been waiting for over a year for Collagenase Phase III study to begin while watching her stage 2 contracture get to stage 3. All the research and conversations with orthopedists tell me that treatment using collagenase injections could be a wonderful alternative to the dismal surgery. There are thousands of people that could benefit from the minimally invasive collagenase treatment. So what is specifically holding up the study? Why are these people made to suffer when a low-risk, fast recovery treatment is literally on the shelf?
|
|
|
08/31/2005 23:49
Thaxton Springfieldnot registered
|
08/31/2005 23:49
Thaxton Springfieldnot registered
|
Collagenase
The Phase III trial weas announced in April of 2001. (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00014742?order=2) I got in touch with the lead researcher last summer and could get no clear answer about when and if the trial would begin.
|
|
|
08/31/2005 23:46
Randy H. not registered
|
08/31/2005 23:46
Randy H. not registered
|
Get On With It!
Steve:
"So what is specifically holding up the study?"
$$$$MONEY$$$$. More specifically, the lack thereof. BioS has struggled for years to raise the necessary capital to fund FDA approval. It's not dead yet, as they now have financial partners. However, many of us long term posters will believe it when we see it.
For now.......save her hand right away!
NA, as performed by Dr. Eaton and four other US surgeons, does almost *exactly* the same thing that the Collagenase injections do. The difference is that the enzyme injections work to weaken Dups tissue at one spot *biochemically*, while NA does it the old fashion way, *mechanically* with a sharp needle. Either way, the outcome is the same.
Read the thread: "Treatment by Dr. Eaton", then look at his web site: http://www.handcenter.org/newfile11.htm
Yes, Collagenase is a *great* treatment option to be attempted before submitting to Traditional Invasive Surgery. What you need to know is that NA is both safe and effective and available *now*. I've hand both, Open Surgery and NA. In my case, the difference could not be more dramatic. Night and Day.
Check it out.
|
|
|
08/31/2005 23:47
jim hnot registered
|
08/31/2005 23:47
jim hnot registered
|
Collagenase vs NA
I've followed the situation with Collagenase for, oh, must be 8 years by now. If I had a contracture heading into stage 3 I wouldn't waste any time even talking to BSTC about trials, I'd be getting a needle aponevrotomy treatment as soon as possible.
Collagenase probably offers little if any advantage over NA, and will be available years from now, if ever. While it may be to Biospecifics' advantage to have patients lined up and waiting for years for a Phase III trial, I see no benefit whatsoever to those patients, with NA available today.
|
|
|
09/01/2005 23:33
George Barbarownot registered
|
09/01/2005 23:33
George Barbarownot registered
|
Collagenase vs NA
I looked at becoming a participant in the collagenase study; but, it had several drawbacks. First it would have been done over a long period of time with weekly then monthly injections, It would have required traveling to and from the test facilities. There would have been a 50/50 chance that you would receive the placebo rather than the real drug. NA is quick and easy and effective; I see no reason to wait for the approval of a procedure that will likely be at least as complicated and painful as the simple breaking up of the bands of elastic tissue with a small needle in about fifteen minutes with little or no real discomfort.
Been there and done the NA almost two years ago.
|
|
|
02/06/2006 23:51
Alannot registered
|
02/06/2006 23:51
Alannot registered
|
Collagenase--Phase III
Collagenase in the Treatment of Dupuytrens Disease
This study is not yet open for patient recruitment. Verified by Stony Brook University November 2005
Sponsors and Collaborators: Stony Brook University Biospecifics Technologies Corp., Lynbrook, NY Information provided by: Stony Brook University ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00260429
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to determine if collagenase injection(s) will straighten the finger contractures associated with Dupuytren's disease. Condition Intervention Phase Dupuytren's Disease With a Minimum 20 Degree Joint Flexion Contracture of One or More Fingers. Drug: Collagenase Phase III
MedlinePlus consumer health information
Study Type: Interventional Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Further study details as provided by Stony Brook University: Primary Outcomes: Primary outcome measure is reduction of flexion contracture. Expected Total Enrollment: 232 Study start: June 2006; Expected completion: June 2007 Last follow-up: June 2007; Data entry closure: June 2007
In a random, placebo controlled, double blind study, collagenase injection therapy will be investigated for it's ability to lyse the Dupuytren's cord.
Resultant cord rupture may obviate the need for patients to have surgery to correct the finger flexion contractures of Dupuytren's disease.
Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years - 85 Years, Genders Eligible for Study: Both Criteria Inclusion Criteria:
diagnosis of Dupuytrens disease minimum 20 degree contracture(s) of the MP and/or PIP joints in any finger excluding the thumb Exclusion Criteria:
any chronic, serious or uncontrolled medical condition inability to conform to study visits (20-30 per year) Location and Contact Information
Please refer to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00260429
Marie A Badalamente 631 444 2215 mbadalamente@notes.cc.sunysb.edu Gail Trocchio 631 444 2215 gtrocchio@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
California UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States 310-206-6337
Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, United States 650-723-3731
Michigan Ford Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States 313-916-3879
More Information
Publications
Badalamente MA, Hurst LC, Hentz VR. Collagen as a clinical target: nonoperative treatment of Dupuytren's disease. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002 Sep;27(5):788-98.
Study ID Numbers: DUPY 303 Last Updated: December 8, 2005 Record first received: November 29, 2005 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00260429 Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2006-02-06
|
|
|
02/16/2006 23:02
Hammer headnot registered
|
02/16/2006 23:02
Hammer headnot registered
|
Collegenase
Does this mean we are back to Phase4 I again?
|
|
|
03/08/2006 23:13
Wolfgangnot registered
|
03/08/2006 23:13
Wolfgangnot registered
|
collagenase
Randy, I would think that you are on the right track. Collagenase probably could do much more than NA, provided its use is safe. It would be great if we had the FDA approval! The upside of the dealy might be that it provides longer term results ...
Wolfgang
|
|
|
05/30/2006 23:47
Steve Coluccinot registered
|
05/30/2006 23:47
Steve Coluccinot registered
|
~dq~Safe noninvasive treatment?~dq~
Sorry, but i can't find the thread that the above phrase in the post refers to. I would very much appreciate hearing about such an alternative to surgery for Dupuytren's.
|
|
|
05/30/2006 23:32
JDnot registered
|
05/30/2006 23:32
JDnot registered
|
Phase 3 trials
This is a response to my inquiry regarding the phase 3 trials :
Postponed until October.
Thank you for your recent inquiry regarding our Dupuytren's disease clinical research study. This is a clinical study evaluating the use of a new drug (an enzyme) as a non-operative injection therapy for Dupuytren's disease. If successful, patients may avoid surgery for correction of their disease.
The study is being performed at the Dept. Orthopaedics, State University of New York at Stony Brook (Long Island) and Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Califonia and at UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Other clinical test sites may be added but we have not established the sites as yet. There is an initial evaluation visit to see if patients meet entry criteria for the study, if accepted, the next visit is a routine medical physical (blood work, EKG, chest X ray). The next visit is the injection treatment. Patients are then seen the next day, weekly for two weeks, monthly for three months and at six, nine and twelve months, for each joint treated. The followup visits do not take long, only 15 minutes or so, but are critically important. More than one injection may be necessary if a first does not have an effect or if multiple joints in different fingers are involved. There is no guarantee of a 100% successful outcome, however, our results to date are very positive. There is no charge for participating in the study.
If you live a distance from Long Island or Palo Alto, Los Angeles, it will be a hardship to travel for the many visits necessary. We do not pay travel expenses. It may take up to 15-25 visits or more in the first year depending on how many fingers are affected by the Dupuytrens Disease. Your own doctor may NOT administer the injection nor perform the followup evaluations as we are the only hospitals approved by the FDA to administer this treatment. A new Phase of study will begin in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Patients must have at least a 20 degree contracture to qualify.
Patient enrollment is limited at Stony Brook and may be at the other Centers as well. You may call 631 444 2215 at Stony Brook or 650 723 3731 at Palo Alto or 310 206 6337 at UCLA or to be placed on a waiting list for the new Phase of study. Enrollment will be limited so placement on the waiting list does not assure a place in the study.
FDA approval (if obtained) will take several more years. If you have been advised to have surgery, you may wish to proceed with it, as your disease will most likely get worse if you wait.
Best wishes to all
JD
|
|
|
|
1 2 3
|
1 2 3
|