| Lost password
502 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
medical malpractice
 1 2
 1 2
04/07/2005 23:10
Kris

not registered

04/07/2005 23:10
Kris

not registered

medical malpractice

Anyone have any information on malpractice litigation after a fascictomy (sp) gone bad?

04/07/2005 23:23
linda

not registered

04/07/2005 23:23
linda

not registered

medical malpractice

i have also looked to find info for surgery gone badly. i even spoke with a laywer friend, not his type of practice. he told me he would ask around seems if only a doctor would come forward and say a error has happened he case is't worth persuing. i havn't given up as a surgen who just did skin grafting told me he saw a severed nerve. will let you know if i can find a lawyer i'm just recovering from skin grafting. i am also disabled becuse i no longer have use of my right hand aso foot.

04/08/2005 23:51
No Name

not registered

04/08/2005 23:51
No Name

not registered

Linda

Stop complaining Linda. Live with it. Too many people sue now anyway. You are just no damned good. Go crawl in a stinking hole. Shut up!

04/08/2005 23:04
LINDA

not registered

04/08/2005 23:04
LINDA

not registered

NO NAME

YOU REALLY ARE EITHER TWO PEOPLE OR ONE VERY SAD PERSON TELLING SOMEONE TO SHUT UP WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO ANYONE SHOULD BE HEARD HOWEVER SHUT UP IS REALLY OVER THE TOP!
LINDA

04/09/2005 23:56
Senor Ultimo

not registered

04/09/2005 23:56
Senor Ultimo

not registered

feudal manor lords

Let Linda speak, this is a forum, not a dictatorship.

04/09/2005 23:55
Kris

not registered

04/09/2005 23:55
Kris

not registered

Dups Mal Practice

If your surgery for Dups was not done properly and the result stinks, like mine so far, there may be a possibility that you have a cause of action against the doctor who recommended and performed the surgery. There is at least one case in Illinois that seems to permit a cause of action on the basis of the doctrine of "res ipsa loquitur". If you have had a bad result from a fasciectomy for dups, you may want to consult a medimal practice attorney in your state. I don't think plastic surgeons should be performing these serious operations for this relatively benign condition without alot more disclosure about the potential and likely problems that seem to result over and over again.

Your thoughts?

Kris

04/10/2005 23:18
Tinkerbell

not registered

04/10/2005 23:18
Tinkerbell

not registered

Surgical Errors

Hi Kris,

Can you translate your latin? Was the case about DC hands?

Tinkerbell

04/10/2005 23:01
Linda 
04/10/2005 23:01
Linda 
Surgical Errors

Hi Kris
I agree Plastic surgens now knowing first hand probably is a poor choice for dealing with DC and my fasciectomy didn't even have the zig zag operation I have seen on all of the picture sites. The surgen did straight cut than when scarrng became evident he debreided even more skin leaveing my palm alost absent. He aso pinned two fingers and now they are frozen can't get a grip. It seems a law suit would just kick the last bit of life out of most people. Being already feeling misled and stupid about making all the wrong choices I now feel I wouldn't have the energy to go up against any doctor. They will say no one can predict the outcome with this disease and how much is the surgery verses the patients healing response.
I have been so angry I need to just deal and hope others look before they leap. I did think I did but obvious I could have made better or no choices fo a longer amount of time.
Nice of you to respond
Linda

04/11/2005 23:36
Kris

not registered

04/11/2005 23:36
Kris

not registered

Surgical Errors

As I understand it, the doctrine of "res ipsa loquitur" (the thing speaks for itself) simply means that the very fact that you achieved a bad result from a situation is sufficient to place the matter before the trier of fact without having to prove that the tortfeasor was negligent or didn't comply with whatever standards were out there. There is a good deal of law on the subject and it is a doctrine which permits an injured party to succeed without having to prove negligence. I will try to get the case citation and post it for your rreading pleasure.

Kris

04/11/2005 23:58
Kris

not registered

04/11/2005 23:58
Kris

not registered

Surgical Errors

The case is:

Walker v. Rumer, 381 N.E.2d 689 (Ill 1978)

The court held that the jury could hear an expert's testimony to the effect that the bad result of the fasciectomy "spoke for itself" and no evidence of the surgeon's negligence was necessary. Interesting.

 1 2
 1 2
sufficient   disclosure   Difference   tortfeasor   dictatorship   malpractice   complaining   recommended   doctrine   possibility   negligence   Tinkerbell   relatively   presentation   Surgical   information   Interesting   understand   fasciectomy   performing