| Lost password
149 users onlineYou are not loggend in.  Login
Thank you
 1
 1
04/06/04 02:11
Frances

not registered

04/06/04 02:11
Frances

not registered

Thank you

Dear Arthur,

Thank you so much for posting your information that Dr. Eaton has not met with Dr. Bourland in person - that they have only spoke briefly on the phone, under the tread 'Push on for more AP training...' . I didn't want your words to get be buried so I created this topic.

I strongly suggest everyone read Arthurs message, then reread all the post from begining to end.

Next stop...Dr. Badois! Randy or someone else...Can you do it? The information would be better coming from someone other then me - some one fresh.

Thank you all for your patience while this has been going on.

Frances

04/06/04 02:42
Larry 
04/06/04 02:42
Larry 
Arthur

Frances,
You need to get out of your own little world.

04/07/04 02:02
Pen Dragon

not registered

04/07/04 02:02
Pen Dragon

not registered

Harsh!

Frances raised legitimate concerns (caveats) about
the background of individuals providing treatment for
DD/DC conditions. Why stifle a voice that values
clinical documentation? You are free to make your own
choices. Would you prefer treatment by individuals
without "bona fides?" Alternatively, are you questioning
"credentialing" when, in fact, no such thing exists for DD?
The public deserves some informed consent about a given
practioner's prepartion and experience for any invasive
procedure. Frances is not "off subject" in my opinion.
No legitimate Doctor would be reticent about his/her
preparation and experience in treating any condition.
It is called a "duty to inform."

 1
 1
preparation   information   providing   experience   Alternatively   condition   conditions   deserves   documentation   treatment   informed   questioning   Frances   procedure   legitimate   credentialing   practioner   prepartion   individuals   background